Legal Opinion
State v. Mathews
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided March 20, 1997No. 20154, 21127Published
1Opinion of the Court
934 P.2d 931 (1997)
129 Idaho 865
STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Marcus W. MATHEWS, Defendant-Appellant.
Marcus W. MATHEWS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
STATE of Idaho, Respondent.
Nos. 20154, 21127.
Supreme Court of Idaho, Moscow, April 1995 Term.
March 20, 1997.
Idaho Legal Aid Services, Inc., E. Maureen Laflin, Supervising Attorney and Megan M. Grant and Sheryl Musgrove, legal interns, argued, Moscow, for appellant.
Douglas Nash, Chief Counsel, Nez Perce Tribal Committee, for Amicus Curiae Nez Perce Tribe.
Alan G. Lance, Attorney General; Michael A. Henderson, Deputy Attorney General, argued,…
Also in this document: Dissent · Schroeder; Dissent · Silak.
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Arizona v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.