Legal Opinion

Sarnelli v. IPI Industries, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 7, 2004PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roberto, J), dated March 26, 2003, which denied her motion to approve a proposed settlement nunc pro tunc in accordance with Workers’ Compensation Law § 29 (5) as untimely.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs motion on the ground that it was untimely (see generally Zamfino v Furman, 1 AD3d 591 [2003]; Matter of Rifenburgh v James, 297 AD2d 901 [2002]; Matter of Bernthon v Utica Mut. Ins. Co., 279 AD2d 728…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bernthon v. Utica Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Zamfino v. FurmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Rifenburgh v. JamesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Singh v. RossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Lobban v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API