Legal Opinion

Peirce v. Conant

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 26, 1964No. Gen. 49,088Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

47 Ill. App.2d 294 (1964)

198 N.E.2d 555

Charles P. Peirce and Lucille K. Peirce, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

Howard R. Conant, Defendant-Appellant.

Gen. No. 49,088.

Illinois Appellate Court — First District, Third Division.

March 26, 1964.

Shaffer, Seelig, Mandel & Shapiro, and Edward W. Barrett and Robert A. Sprecher, all of Chicago, for appellant.

Raymond I. Suekoff, of Chicago (Avern B. Scolnik, of counsel), for appellees.

2Opinion of the Court · DempseyJustice Dempsey

This is an appeal from a summary judgment against the defendant as guarantor of the performance of lessees of the covenants of a lease. The judgment comprises defaults in the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Alschuler v. SchiffIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Halloran v. Belt Ry. Co. of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960
  3. Tezak v. CooperAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960
  4. Peirce v. ConantAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  5. People Ex Rel. Carr v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API