Legal Opinion

Stickney v. Chapman

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 11, 1902PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Attachment. Before Judge Reece. City court of Eloyd county. December 14, 1901.

1Opinion of the CourtLittle, J.

Stickney and wife caused an attachment to issue against the property of Chapman, on the ground that he was a nonresident of the State of Georgia, which was levied on two certain lots of land in the city of Rome, Georgia. To the declaration in attachment, which was filed, the defendant interposed a plea, and also filed a traverse of the grounds of attachment, in which he denied that he was anon-resident of the State of Georgia,but averred that he did reside in the State, and in Eloyd county, at the time the affidavit to obtain the attachment was made, and had resided in said county for a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Keller v. CarrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  2. Hickson v. Brown, Weddington & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  3. Egener v. JuchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Raymond v. LeishmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  2. Swiney v. State Highway DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  3. Farmer v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  4. Flemister Grocery Co. v. Wright Mercantile & Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  5. Biggers v. Bank of RinggoldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API