Legal Opinion

Curran v. Williams

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1958No. Docket 24, Calendar 45,781PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKavanagh, J.

Plaintiff George F. Curran was both lawyer and real-estate broker in the proposed sale of a theater in Almont, Michigan, which gave rise to this litigation. The proposed purchaser of the theater signed a purchase agreement in the sum of $59,000, dated June 4, 1951, and paid a $1,000 deposit to Curran. The sellers, Lawrence M. Williams and Rufina A. Williams, accepted the purchase agreement, but the transaction was never completed.

Both sellers and purchaser claimed the breach of contract was committed by the opposite party, and both demanded the deposit from Curran.

At this point Curran filed a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jaquith v. HudsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Ross v. LoescherMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Wilkinson v. LantermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Hall v. GargaroMichigan Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. UAW-GM Human Resource Center v. KSL Recreation Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. United States v. L. C. ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  3. Hemlock Semiconductor Operations, LLC v. SolarWorld Industries Sachsen GmbHCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  4. MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
  5. Moore v. St Clair CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API