Legal Opinion · Dissent

Seabolt v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief Board

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 25, 1980No. 14181Published

1DissentFerren, Associate Judge

I respectfully dissent because, on this record, binding precedent mandates reversal and remand to the Board.

I

This case concerns a firefighter who was injured in the line of duty and, as a result, was disabled from returning to a job that requires physical fitness to perform all assignable firefighting duties. I agree with my colleagues’ conclusion that a firefighter in this situation is not entitled to disability retirement under D.C.Code 1973, § 4-521(2) if there is available a permanent, lighter-duty job (which he or she is physically capable of performing) in the “grade or class of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jameson's Liquors, Inc. v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Coakley v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Jones v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Torvik v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API