Legal Opinion

Follett v. Reese

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1851Published

This is a bill in chancery, reserved in Erie county. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtRanney, J.

This cause was reserved for the purpose of settling the single question, whether the complainant is entitled to enforce a lien which he claims to the avails of the trust property in his hands, as against the defendants, George B. and Jacob Eeese, for the payment of the balance of the purchase money still due him. The facts of the case, so far as they bear upon this question, are theseIn the year 1833, Wildman & Mills, claiming to be the true owners in fee of a tract of 559 32-100 acres of land adjoining San-dusky City, sold it to Follett, Camp & Neill, for $13,983, payable in five equal…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Springle v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1823

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API