Legal Opinion

J. Lauritzen A/s Lauritzen Reefers A/s v. Dashwood Shipping, Ltd.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 7, 1995No. 94-56104PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEEZER, Circuit Judge:

J. Lauritzen A/S and Lauritzen Reefers A/S (“Lauritzen”) appeal the district court’s dismissal of their maritime attachment action for lack of admiralty subject matter jurisdiction. Lauritzen contends that the district court erred in concluding it lacked admiralty jurisdiction over the alleged tortious interference with a contract. Dashwood Shipping Ltd. (“Dashwood”) argues that this court lacks jurisdiction to hear the appeal because of the district court’s release of the attachment against the vessel. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm.

I

Laur…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Jerome B. Grubart, Inc. v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Foremost Insurance v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Sisson v. RubySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Republic National Bank of Miami v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Transatlantic Marine Claims Agency, Inc. v. Ace Shipping Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  2. Transatlantic Marine Claims Agency, Inc. v. Ace Shipping Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  3. Chad Barnes v. Sea Hawaii Rafting, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  4. Taghadomi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. Ventura Packers, Inc. v. F/V JEANINE KATHLEENCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API