Legal Opinion
Huntington v. Maul
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 17, 2008PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*726Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Thomas Maul, Commissioner of the New York State Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, dated August 21, 2006, which, after a hearing, rejected the petitioner’s objection to the establishment of a community residential facility for the disabled in the Town of Huntington.
Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with one bill of costs.
“[T]he only ground for sustaining a municipality’s objection to the establishment of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jennings v. New York State Office of Mental HealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Town of Mount Pleasant v. New York State Office of Mental HealthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Town of Mt. Pleasant v. ToulonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Town of Oyster Bay v. MaulAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Village of Port Chester v. AyotteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
3Cited by5 opinions
- Matter of Village of Port Chester, N.Y. v. DelaneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Town of Boston v. New York State Office for People With Developmental DisabilitiesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- City of Mount Vernon v. OMRDDAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Matter of Town of Mount Pleasant v. LoomisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- Town of Boston v. New York State Office for People With Developmental DisabilitiesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017