Legal Opinion

George Harms Excavating Co. v. Monroe Township Municipal Utilities Authority

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 7, 1972PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gerofsky, A. J. S. C.

This is the return day of an order to show cause why judgment should not be entered, pursuant to R. 4:67, declaring defendant utilities authority subject to the Local Public Contracts Law, N. J. 8. A. 40A :11-1 et seq.

Plaintiffs are four contractors and an association of contractors. Defendant is a municipal utilities authority created pursuant to N. J. 8. A. 40:14B-1 et seq. On February 9, *4981972, defendant by resolution authorized the advertisement for bids on two contracts known as W-3 and W-4 for the installation of a water distribution system and storage facility…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Application of Saddle RiverSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  2. Pied Piper Ice Cream, Inc. v. Essex Cty. Park Comm.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  3. Rothermel v. McLaughlinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API