George Harms Excavating Co. v. Monroe Township Municipal Utilities Authority
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
Gerofsky, A. J. S. C.
This is the return day of an order to show cause why judgment should not be entered, pursuant to R. 4:67, declaring defendant utilities authority subject to the Local Public Contracts Law, N. J. 8. A. 40A :11-1 et seq.
Plaintiffs are four contractors and an association of contractors. Defendant is a municipal utilities authority created pursuant to N. J. 8. A. 40:14B-1 et seq. On February 9, *4981972, defendant by resolution authorized the advertisement for bids on two contracts known as W-3 and W-4 for the installation of a water distribution system and storage facility…
2Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Application of Saddle RiverSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
- Pied Piper Ice Cream, Inc. v. Essex Cty. Park Comm.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- Rothermel v. McLaughlinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981