Raymond W. Luckie, Et Ux. v. Environmental Protection Agency
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
J. BLAINE ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:
Appellants (“Residents”) appeal from the district court’s dismissal of their complaint for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Residents’ claims against the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) were premised upon the Clean Air Act (“CAA”), 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq. (1982), the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (“RCRA”), 42 U.S.C. § 6901 et seq. (1982), and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq. (1982). We affirm in part, and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- County of Los Angeles v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Weinstein v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- DeFunis v. OdegaardSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Norma Faye Pyles Lynch Family Purpose LLC v. Putnam CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
- Sample v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Algeran, Inc. v. Advance Ross Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Rosemere Neighborhood Ass'n v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. v. Knupfer (In Re PW, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.