Legal Opinion
Detraz v. Fontana
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided November 10, 1981No. 8331PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LABORDE, Judge.
This appeal involves the interpretation of LSA-R.S. 42:261 E, a statute granting certain defendants, under specific conditions, the right to require plaintiff to furnish a bond for attorney’s fees before proceeding with trial.
On May 28, 1980, Anthony J. Fontana, Jr., and Charles Dore (appellants) filed a third party demand against the Vermilion Parish Police Jury. On June 3, 1980, by supplemental and amending third party demand, Jewitt Hulin, secretary-treasurer of the Vermilion Parish Police Jury, was joined as third party defendant. Hulin and the Police Jury (appellees) filed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. KrasSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- White v. CrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Houston v. BrownLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
- Brown v. Aetna Life & Cas. Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Detraz v. FontanaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
- Detraz v. FontanaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
- Motty v. Vermilion Parish Police JuryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981