Legal Opinion

In Re Skoog Estate

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1964No. Calendar No. 10, Docket No. 50,306PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

373 Mich. 27 (1964)

127 N.W.2d 888

In re SKOOG ESTATE.

SKOOG

v.

WEDGE.

Calendar No. 10, Docket No. 50,306.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided May 4, 1964.

Messner & LaBine (Theodore Messner, of counsel), for proponent plaintiff.

Michael J. Khoury (Ronald L. Greenberg, of counsel), for contesting defendant.

SMITH, J.

This will contest was certified from probate court to circuit court, tried without a jury, and from a judgment for proponent, a daughter of the testatrix, contestant appeals. The contestant, who is a son of the testatrix, Hilma Skoog, objects to the allowance of probate, alleging that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Severance v. SeveranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Domzalski v. JozefiakMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. In Re Kuzawa's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Skoog v. WedgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Marlo Beauty Supply, Inc v. Farmers Insurance Group of CompaniesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. In Re Bem EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. in Re Mardigian EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Papenhaus v. CombsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. in Re Mardigian EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API