Legal Opinion

Rasmussen v. Pacific Fruit Exchange

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 26, 1931No. Docket No. 282PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

The complaint in this action contains eleven separate causes of action. Plaintiff and his father, M. Rasmussen, were engaged in the joint enterprise of raising Thompson seedless grapes for market. M. Rasmussen and ten others assigned their causes of action against the defendant corporation to the plaintiff, who thereupon brought suit against defendant upon his own and the assigned causes of action. Except for the several amounts of grapes delivered, and the several amounts of indebtedness claimed, the causes of action are identical.

It is alleged by plaintiff that on or about the fifth day of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Glantz v. FreedmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. New York Central Railroad v. Frank H. Buck Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Oakdale Mercantile Co. v. BaerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Jackson v. BelmontCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API