Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Malloy (In Re Malloy)

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 2019No. 1996AP001300-DPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

¶1 We review a report filed by Referee Dennis J. Flynn recommending that the court reinstate the license of Robert T. Malloy to practice law in Wisconsin with certain conditions. Upon careful review of the matter we agree that Attorney Malloy's license should be reinstated with certain conditions, as described herein. We hold in abeyance until further order of the court our determination as to whether Attorney Malloy should be required to pay the full costs of the reinstatement proceeding, which are $6,362.17 as of December 4, 2018.

¶2 Attorney Malloy was admitted to practice law in Wisconsin…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against EisenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against MalloyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  3. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against MalloyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  4. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against MalloyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael R. BauerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael R. BauerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API