State v. Grunewald
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Theodore Grünewald was charged with conducting a barroom without having obtained a permit and within 300 feet of a church or school. Defendant demurred, and, his demurrer having been sustained, St. Clair Adams, District Attorney, applies for writs of certiorari, prohibition, and mandamus.
1Opinion of the Court
Statement of the Case.
MONROE, J.
Defendant, as president of the Grünewald Hotel Company, is charged with having violated section 8, Act No. 176, p. 240, of 1908, by conducting a barroom on January 1, 1909, without having obtained a permit therefor, and at the same time and place with having conducted a barroom “within 300 feet of a church or school, measured both by the ordinary walking distance between such barroom and such church or school, or measured in an air line from the nearest point of the building in which said barroom is conducted to the nearest point in the building occupied by…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cassard v. TracySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1900
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mouledoux v. MaestriSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
- Maginnis Land & Improvement Co. v. MarcelloSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
- Sennette v. Police Jury of St. Mary's ParishSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
- State ex rel. Boston Club v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
- State v. FlandrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.