Legal Opinion

Clapp v. Gilt Edge Consolidated Mines Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1913PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lawrence 'County. H-on. William G. Rice, Judge. Action -by Moses E. Clapp and others against the Gilt Edge Consolidated1 Mines Company, J. S. Ford, and others. From a judgment -for plaintiff's against defendant Ford, and from an order denying him a new trial, he 'appeals, .and the other defendants appeal from an order granting a new trial after judgment -in their favor.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lawrence 'County. H-on. William G. Rice, Judge. Action -by Moses E. Clapp and others against the Gilt Edge Consolidated1 Mines Company, J. S. Ford, and others. From a judgment -for plaintiff's against defendant Ford, and from an order denying him a new trial, he 'appeals, .and the other defendants appeal from an order granting a new trial after judgment -in their favor. The prior correspondence between the parties shows that the word “deal” referred to a proposition requiring assent both of bondholders and respondents as judgment holders. A proposal is revoked by…

1Opinion of the CourtMcCO-Y, J.

It appears from the record that on and prior to the 6th 'day of April, 1910, a corporation, known as the Gilt Edge Maid Gold Mining Company, was indebted in the sum of $36,496 on account of various miner’s liens which had been reduced to judgment in one joint action; that -a foreclosure sale of the mining properties of said corporation -had- -been made thereunder on the 6th day of April, 1909, and -that the time for redemption from such foreclosure sa-le would expire on the 6th -day of April, *1271910; that said corporation at said -time was also indebted0 in the sum of $44,000 represented by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Minneapolis Threshing Machine Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  2. Rogers v. BurrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. Peninsula Leasing Co. v. CodyMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Webb v. Baltimore & Eastern Shore RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1893

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nelson v. WEB Water Development Ass'n, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Tri-State Refining & Investment Co. v. Apaloosa Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Spencer v. McGuffinIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Coleman Hotel Co. v. CrawfordTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  5. Lovely v. WangsnessSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API