Legal Opinion

Supple v. International Railway Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 26, 1924PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sears, J.:

The plaintiff seeks to recover damages against the defendant, which operates a street railway, for an assault upon him committed by a motorman in defendant’s employ. Liability is dependent upon the relation of carrier and passenger existing between the defendant and plaintiff at the time of the assault. (Stewart v. Brooklyn & Crosstown R. R. Co., 90 N. Y. 588.)

Although it is true that the plaintiff in testifying gave different versions of the details of the transaction, it remained a question for the jury to determine which version was correct. (Ochs v. Woods, 221 N. Y. 335.)

There…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ochs v. . WoodsNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Stewart v. . Brooklyn and Crosstown R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. Garricott v. . New York State RailwaysNew York Court of Appeals · 1918

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Trebitsch v. Goelet Leasing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  2. Barad v. New York Rapid Transit Corp.City of New York Municipal Court · 1937
  3. Lewin v. MoodyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API