Supple v. International Railway Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Sears, J.:
The plaintiff seeks to recover damages against the defendant, which operates a street railway, for an assault upon him committed by a motorman in defendant’s employ. Liability is dependent upon the relation of carrier and passenger existing between the defendant and plaintiff at the time of the assault. (Stewart v. Brooklyn & Crosstown R. R. Co., 90 N. Y. 588.)
Although it is true that the plaintiff in testifying gave different versions of the details of the transaction, it remained a question for the jury to determine which version was correct. (Ochs v. Woods, 221 N. Y. 335.)
There…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ochs v. . WoodsNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Stewart v. . Brooklyn and Crosstown R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Garricott v. . New York State RailwaysNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
3Cited by3 opinions
- Trebitsch v. Goelet Leasing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- Barad v. New York Rapid Transit Corp.City of New York Municipal Court · 1937
- Lewin v. MoodyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1928