Legal Opinion

United States v. Julio Hernandez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 20, 2014No. 13-50632PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Julio Cesar Arriaga-Hernandez (“Hernandez”) appeals the 33-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) (2012). The sentencing judge enhanced Hernandez’s sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) after finding that Hernandez’s prior California conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm qualified as an aggravated felony. We have jurisdiction over the district court’s final judgment under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012). The district court did not have the benefit of our recent decision in United States v. Aguilera-Rios, 769…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Moncrieffe v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Gonzales v. Duenas-AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. United States v. Aguilera-RiosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. Melvin Martinez-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. Michael BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. Elisio Atenia Lorenzo v. Jefferson Sessions, IIICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  4. Aracely Marinelarena v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  5. United States v. Daladier Murillo-AlvaradoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API