Legal Opinion

Beck v. Northwestern R. Co. of S.C.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 8, 1916No. 9500Published

Before Bowman, J., Sumter, November, 1915. Action by Julia V. Beck against the Northwestern Railroad Company of South Carolina.

Read the full summary

Before Bowman, J., Sumter, November, 1915. Action by Julia V. Beck against the Northwestern Railroad Company of South Carolina. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. cite: Former decision: 95 S. C. 339; 99 S. C. 303. Amendment of complaint: 81 S. C. 574; 95 S. C. 339; 67 S. C. 122. Notice: Civil Code, secs. 4533, 3543. cite: As to notice of motion to amend: Code Civil Proc., sec. 441. Amendment: 31 S. C. 378. Distinguishes'72 S. C. 235. submits: I. A new trial means a trial de novo, and is conducted just as if there had been no previous trial With this limitation every proposition…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Watts.

*323This is the third appeal in this case, the first is reported in 95 S. C. 339, 78 S. E. 994, the second in 99 S. C. 310, 83 S. E. 335. In the last appeal the judgment of Circuit Court was reversed, and a new trial granted. The case was then heard in 1915 by his Honor, Judge Bowman, and a jury, who directed a verdict in favor of defendant company. •Plaintiff appeals after entry of judgment.

1-3 The first and second exceptions allege error on the part of his Honor in refusing the motion of the plaintiff, when case was called for trial, to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Beck v. Northwestern R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1914
  2. Beck v. Northwestern R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API