Legal Opinion

Cawley v. Allums

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1975No. B-4792PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Justice.

James Oris Cawley, the natural father of an eight-year-old child, complains of the *791trial court’s order of adoption because he did not give his written consent to the child’s adoption and his consent was not excused by the provisions of section 6(a) of article 46a, Vernon’s Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat. Ann.:

Sec. 6. (a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, no adoption shall be permitted except with the written consent of the living parents of the child; provided, however, that if a living parent or parents shall voluntarily abandon and desert a child sought to be adopted, for a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Heard v. BaumanTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Leithold v. PlassCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  3. Cawley v. AllumsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Holick v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Wiley v. SpratlanTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  3. in the Interest of D.S.P. and H.R.P., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006
  4. In the Interest of V.R.W.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2001
  5. In the Interest of S.K.S., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1983

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API