Legal Opinion

In re Albert O. Brown & Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 14, 1909PublishedCited by 2 opinions

. Iii Bankruptcy. On petition to review referee’s denial of priority to claim for wages.

1Opinion of the Court

HAND, District Judge.

Act March 2, 3867, c. 176, § 27, 14 Stat. 517, provided that priority should not be given, “except that wages due from him [the bankrupt] to any operative or clerk or house servant” shall be preferred. In the present act (Act July 1, 1898, c. 511, § 64b (4), 30 Stat. 563 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3447]) the words are “workman, clerk, or servant.” “Workman” is possibly a wider phrase than “operative,” and “servant” is undoubtedly wider than “house servant”; but the section is obviously copied after the law of 1867.

It is quite clear that Olmsted is not a “workman” for the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Grubbs-Wiley Grocery Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1899
  2. In re CaldwellDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1908

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Colby v. Graniteville Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  2. In Re Industrial Car Manufacturing Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API