Legal Opinion

Le Roy v. Collins

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1908No. Docket No. 9PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Kent; Wolcott, J. Bill by Simeon Le Roy and another against Joel Collins to enjoin the closing of an alley. From a decree dismissing the bill, complainants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

We quote from the brief of complainants and appellants the following statement of facts:

“Complainants own lot fourteen (14) and defendant and wife own fractional lots one (1), four (4), five (5), eight (8), nine (9), twelve (12), thirteen (13), and sixteen (16), and lots eighteen (18) and nineteen (19), all in block two (2), Coit & Co’s addition to Grand Rapids, Mich. According to the recorded plat, an alley sixteen (16) feet wide extends south from Hastings street (the north line of this block) four hundred and forty-five (445) feet along and past the rear end of complainants’ lot, and in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Plumer v. JohnstonMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Comstock v. SharpMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Le Roy v. CollinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  2. LeRoy v. CollinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API