Legal Opinion · Dissent

Savarese v. Ohio Farmers Insurance Co. of Leroy

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 4, 1932Published

1Dissent

Lehman, J. (dissenting).

The defendant insurance company has issued a policy insuring the owner of a building against direct loss and damage by fire. The policy contains the usual mortgagee clause providing that “ Loss or damage, if any, under this policy, shall be payable to Pasquale Savarese and Giacomo Savarese as mortgagee, as interest may appear, and this insurance, as to the interest of the mortgagee only therein, shall not be invalidated by any act or neglect of the mortgagor or owner of the within described property, * *

We have repeatedly pointed out that by virtue of such a mortgagee…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kernochan v. . the New-York Bowery Fire Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Excelisor F. Ins. Co. v. . R. Ins. Co. of Liverp'l.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Waring v. . LoderNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  4. Goldstein v. National Liberty Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. Foster v. . Van ReedNew York Court of Appeals · 1877

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API