Legal Opinion

Onder v. Kaminski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 24, 2003PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCaffrey, J.), dated April 4, 2002, as granted the motion of the defendant Diane Kaminski for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against her on the ground that the plaintiff Ismet Onder did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chaplin v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Prieston v. MassaroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Polizzi v. Won Jun ChoiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. O'Neill v. O'NeillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. DeSimone v. MejiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Berkowitz v. Decker Transport Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Perez v. HilarionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Positko v. KrawiecAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. Hussain v. Manhattan Cable T.V.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  5. Balram v. CJ Transportation, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API