Legal Opinion

Faraldo v. Ferdinand Gumbel & Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 12, 1910No. 18.429Published

Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; T. C. W. Ellis, Judge. Action by H. B. Faraldo against Ferdinand Gumbel & Co.. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

SOMMERVILLE, J.

The case is stated in the former opinion of the court, wherein the cause was ordered remanded for further proceedings.

We have considered with great care the argument submitted to us on the rehearing in this case without being able to change the conclusions first adopted, except to the extent of recalling the portion of the decree which sets aside the judgment appealed from, and remands the ease for further trial.

In the ease of Arrowsmith v. Gordon, 3 La. Ann. 110, on rehearing, Mr. Justice Rost, in disposing of the rule to be adopted in measuring damages in a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Markham v. . JaudonNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  2. Baker v. . DrakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Arrowsmith v. GordonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1848
  4. New Orleans Draining Co. v. De LizardiSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1847
  5. State v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API