Legal Opinion
Alexander v. Weishuhn
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 5, 1911No. Docket No. 15PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Error to Charlevoix; Mayne, J. Replevin by Charles R. Alexander and Andrew E. Alexander, copartners as Alexander Brothers, against Peter Weishuhn. A judgment for plaintiffs on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by defendant on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The plaintiffs were retailers of intoxicating liquors, doing business under a license from the State. Act No. 291, Pub. Acts 1909. A sale of the business, with their stock in trade, was made to the defendant; their contract being put in writing, as follows:
“contract.
“Memorandum of agreement, made this 19th day of September, A. D. 1908, by and between Charles R. Alexander and Andrew E. Alexander, the parties comprising the copartnership firm of Alexander Bros., of East Jordan, Mich., party of the first part, and Joseph Erler and Peter Weishuhn, copartners, and comprising the firm of Erler &…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Tucker v. MowreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
- Aspell v. HosbeinMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Brazee v. BryantMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Pillen v. EricksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Winfield v. DodgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Epps v. 4 Quarters Restoration LLCMichigan Supreme Court · 2015
- Rothschild v. SchneiderMichigan Supreme Court · 1911