Rothstein v. Autourist A/S
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSamuel J. Silverman, J.
Defendant moves to resettle short-form order heretofore made so as to provide explicitly in the order that this court does not have personal jurisdiction over defendant and that any judgment based on the second and third causes of action should be effective only against and to the extent of property of defendant duly attached prior to entry of judgment. The court made substantially those statements in its original memorandum deciding the motion and in the court’s opinion those statements were at least true under the law as it stood at the time the amended pleading was served and the motion…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Developers Small Business Investment Corp. v. Puerto Rico Land & Development Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1964
- State ex rel. Riley v. HoytCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976