State v. Terry
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Albin
*381**222A police officer has the lawful right to request that a driver, stopped for a motor vehicle violation, provide proof of ownership. N.J.S.A. 39:3-29. One reason for this regulatory law is to ensure that the driver is not operating a stolen motor vehicle. When a driver is unwilling or unable to present such proof, our jurisprudence permits the officer to conduct a limited search of those places in the vehicle where proof of ownership is ordinarily kept. See State v. Keaton, 222 N.J. 438, 448-49, 119 A.3d 906 (2015) ; State v. Pena-Flores, 198 N.J. 6, 31, 965 A.2d 114 (2009). This very…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Anderson v. Department of Administration, Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
- v. AlemayehuColorado Court of Appeals · 2021
- DAVID R. MARTELLA VS. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, (POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
- DEJESUS v. DAVISDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. AARON L. WILLIAMSON (18-01-0002, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.