Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Johnson
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 1, 1917No. 8525Published
Complaint; from city court of Baxley — Judge Sellers. December 30, 1916.
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, J.
1. A decision on the first writ of error is binding as the law of the case on a second writ of error.. Gray v. Conyers, 70 Ga. 349; King v. Davidson, 72 Ga. 192; Saulsbury v. Iverson, 73 Ga. 733; Western & Atlantic R. Co. v. Third National Bank, 125 Ga. 489 (54 S. E. 621); Southern Bell Tel. Co. v. Glawson, 140 Ga. 507 (79 S. E. 136).
2. The law of this particular case having been fixed and determined in its formet adjudication by this court (Johnson v. Johnson, 14 Ga. App. 194, 80 S. E. 660), the overruling of the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial was not erroneous.
Judgment affirmed.
Wade, C.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. GlawsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Third National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Gray v. ConyersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
- Saulsbury, Respess & Co. v. IversonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
- Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.