Legal Opinion

Ham v. City of Salem

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 15, 1868PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChapman, C. J.

Under the St. of 1864, c. 268, for supplying the city of Salem with pure water, the respondents have taken certain lands of the petitioner, situated on the margin of Wen-ham Pond, and a jury has been summoned and has returned a verdict assessing his damages. Exceptions have been taken by the respondents to some of the rulings of the sheriff.

1. They contend that certain evidence which they offered wa? wrongfully excluded. They offered to prove that the fences which had inclosed thg land were not needed by them, but were put up temporarily and for the benefit of the petitioner; and that he was…

2Cited by33 opinions

  1. Edmands v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  2. New Central Coal Co. v. George's Creek Coal & Iron Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1873
  3. Drury v. Midland RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
  4. Paine v. WoodsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  5. Proprietors of Locks & Canals on Merrimack River v. Nashua & Lowell RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API