Legal Opinion

Wrenger v. Leigeber

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 10, 1936No. 6 Div. 867PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RICE, Judge.

Suit by appellee against appellant to recover the amount of a mortgage note given for the balance of the purchase price of a “secondhand” automobile.

The learned trial judge gave to the jury the general affirmative charge, with hypothesis, to find in favor of the plaintiff, appellee.

Appellant’s industrious counsel have made twenty-three assignments of error; and have filed here a rather voluminous brief.

But it seems, and we hold, that no one of the assignments of error is “argued” here in the way and manner we have outlined, with the approval of our Supreme Court, as being…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. SmalleyAlabama Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. SmalleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Morgan Plan Co. v. Accounts Supervision Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API