Legal Opinion

American Steel & Iron Co. v. Wooster

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 1, 1948No. 3738PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.

The exceptions to the findings and rulings made with respect to the merits of the replevin action are overruled. The finding that the parties to the contract did not intend title to pass until the vendor had loaded the rails on cars and delivered them to a carrier was warranted by the evidence. Since this was never done, property in the rails never passed to the plaintiff. Chellis v. Grimes, 72 N. H. 104; R. L., c. 200, s. 19, Rules 2, 5; Id., s. 46 (I). At the time of replevin, the defendants were entitled to immediate possession (Claremont Gas Company v. Wooster, 91 N. H. 439, 441), and the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stanley v. NealeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  2. Ware River Railroad v. VibbardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. BonsantSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API