Legal Opinion

Eberhardt, Hoke H AKA Eberhardt, Hoke Henry Jr.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 13, 2015No. WR-79,963-02Published

1Opinion of the Court

j ' 7”1,4@3`02 CAUSE NO. 12-05-05302-CR-(2) EX PARTE IN THE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE HOKE HENRY EBERHARDT 2218T. JUDICIAL DISTRICT l MONTGOMERY COUNTY, TEXA$ APPLICANT ' 3 GBJEchoNS HE©E VED §M To `HABEAS coURTS REPORT AND FINDING. @GUHTOFCWMINALAP pPEALS GROUND 0st ` ASSMC@SFE,C!@FK The Appellant argued that his Attorney was ineffective for not moving to have the charges dissmissed when the State failed to indict him with a properly charging instrument in violation of State Statutory Rights. Article 32.01 and 28.061. See Code Of Criminal Procedure. The State has Stated that the Appellant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Ex Parte GardnerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  3. State v. Terrazas, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API