Legal Opinion

Fidelity Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Kansas City v. Enright

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided March 26, 1920No. 225PublishedCited by 9 opinions

In Equity. Suit by the Fidelity National Bank & Trust Company of Kansas City against C. F. Enright, Bank Commissioner of the State of Missouri. On motion to strike answer.

1Opinion of the Court

VAN VALKENBURGH, District Judge.

The complainant, under the name of Fidelity Trust Company, was formerly a trust company organized under the laws of the state of Missouri as such. Later it reorganized as a national banking corporation, clothed by the Federal Reserve Board with the right to act as trustee, executor, administrator, registrar of stocks and bonds, guardian of estates, assignee, receiver, committee of estates of lunatics, or in any other capacity in which state banks, trust companies, or other corporations, which come into competition with national banks, are permitted to act under…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  3. Davis v. Elmira Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. First National Bank v. Fellows Ex Rel. Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Middletown Trust Co. v. Middletown National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  2. Missouri Ex Rel. Burnes National Bank of St. Joseph v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. People v. Franklin National BankNew York Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Adams v. Atlantic National BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  5. In Re Estate of McElfreshSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API