Legal Opinion
Caryl S. v. Child & Adolescent Treatment Services, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 10, 1994PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Barbara Howe, J.
Plaintiffs have instituted this action to recover damages for injuries allegedly suffered by them as a result of various acts by defendants which plaintiffs characterize as negligent. Defendants have not yet answered in the action, but have instead moved pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the action on the grounds that "the complaint fails to state a cause of action for negligence” and that, as to what defendants view as the controlling acts alleged in the complaint, they are immune from liability.
I
Plaintiffs are the paternal grandparents of Amanda…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Guggenheimer v. GinzburgNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Rovello v. Orofino Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hungerford v. JonesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
- Hungerford v. JonesDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1997
- Arline v. City of JacksonvilleDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2005
- Webb v. Neuroeducation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Caryl S. v. Child & Adolescent Treatment Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.