Legal Opinion

Gronemeyer v. Hunter Manufacturing Corp.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided July 6, 1954PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Seitz, Chancellor:

This is an action to enjoin the defendant corporation from using certain drawings and patterns or copies thereof, and for an accounting of profits earned by defendant.

Plaintiff, George E. Gronemeyer, is a mechanical engineer who for some years has specialized in industrial installation. He devised *517a system of reflective metal sheets arranged in layers with air spacings between which he called “Mirror Insulation”. The basic idea was subsequently incorporated in a patent which was granted him.

The plaintiff by testing and experimentation came to develop a practical and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours Powder Co. v. MaslandSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Hoeltke v. C. M. Kemp Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
  3. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Coca-Cola Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1920
  4. Saco-Lowell Shops v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
  5. Allen-Qualley Co. v. Shellmar Products Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Delaware Chemicals, Inc. v. Reichhold Chemicals, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1956
  2. Gronemeyer v. Hunter Mfg. Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1954
  3. Gronemeyer v. Hunter Manufacturing Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API