Legal Opinion
Interior Custom Concepts v. Slovak
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 31, 2007No. 1D06-6642PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
In this workers’ compensation appeal, appellants Interior Custom Concepts, Inc. and Protregrity Services, Inc., the employer and insurance carrier (E/C) respectively, appeal the Compensation Order on Attorney’s Fees and Costs. We agree with the E/C that there is not competent, substantial evidence in the record to support the Judge of Compensation Claims’ calculation of attorney’s fees owed the claimant and his attorney. Accordingly, we reverse the Compensation Order and remand for further proceedings.
I. Background
In April 1999, the claimant, Ron Slovak, a cabinet maker for Interior Custom…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Polote Corp. v. MeredithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- BP CONST., INC. v. GarciaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Groves v. ButlerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
3Cited by6 opinions
- Interstate Brands Corp./Broadspire v. BlancoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Laura Lewis v. Dollar Rent A Car and ESIS WC ClaimsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Wojick v. State, Department of Children & FamiliesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Interstate Brands Corp./Broadspire v. BlancoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Interstate Brands Corp./Broadspire v. BlancoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.