Finnegan v. Ulmer
Nevada Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of tbe Fifth Judicial District of the State of Nevada, Nye County; J. P. O'Brien, Judge. Action by Lillian May Finnegan against Bert Ulmer, William Mulholland, and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant Mulholland appeals. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
*524By the. Court,
Talbot, J.:
The appeal is taken by the defendant Mulholland from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for rent or the value of the use, and for the restitution, of the possession of leased premises. The record contains the judgment roll and a bill of exceptions. The only specification of error is to the order of the court allowing the complaint to be amended to conform to the evidence, made after the trial and before final entry of judgment.
It is claimed that this order was erroneous (1) because upon the pleadings and evidence the defendant Mulholland was entitled to judgment…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McCausland v. RalstonNevada Supreme Court · 1877
- McGurn v. McInnisNevada Supreme Court · 1898
- State v. WilliamsNevada Supreme Court · 1909
- Burbank v. RiversNevada Supreme Court · 1887
- Candler v. Washoe Lake Reservoir & Galena Creek Ditch Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. ManganaNevada Supreme Court · 1910
- State v. ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 1913
- Diversified Capital Corp. v. City of North Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 1979
- Hilton v. HymersNevada Supreme Court · 1937
- Miller v. ThompsonNevada Supreme Court · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.