Legal Opinion

Love v. McDonald's Restaurant

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided April 7, 1989No. 62,451PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Elliott, J.:

Claimant Mary Love appeals from a workers’ compensation award which denied her compensation for traumatic neurosis. The appeal raises the single issue of what a claimant must prove to be compensated for traumatic neurosis under the Workers’ Compensation Act, K.S.A. 44-501 et seq.

The trial court applied the four-part test set forth in Ruse v. State, 10 Kan. App. 2d 508, 708 P.2d 216 (1984), in determining the issue. Because we hold that Ruse no longer is an accurate statement of the test, we reverse.

The facts are not seriously in dispute. Love was working as a swing manager for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Barr v. Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  2. Berger v. Hahner, Foreman & Cale, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. Morris v. Garden City Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  4. Jacobs v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. of Kansas, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  5. Rund v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. CephasSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  2. McCamey v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Gleason v. Samaritan Home & Church Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  4. Beam v. Concord Hospitality, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1994
  5. Bernard v. Doskocil Companies, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API