Legal Opinion

United States v. Alan Barnett

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided October 12, 2016No. 14-4866, 14-4885UnpublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed in part and reversed in part by unpublished opinion. Judge Wynn wrote the opinion, in which Judge Agee and Judge Schroeder joined.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

WYNN, Circuit Judge:

In 2012, the government indicted twenty-eight individuals for various crimes arising out of their alleged involvement with the gang United Blood Nation (“UBN”). Two of these individuals, Defendants Samantha Williams and Alan Barnett, proceeded to a joint trial. The jury convicted both Defendants of conspiring to violate the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  3. H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Salinas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Dricko HuskeyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024
  2. United States v. SandovalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
  3. Barnett v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2020
  4. United States v. Alandus SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024
  5. United States v. Jonathan WrayCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API