Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Acme Markets, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 10, 1975Published

1DissentGabrielli, J.

Just three years’ ago, this court in People v L. A. Witherill, Inc. (29 NY2d 446), by a decision and opinion in which the seven Judges unanimously concurred, held specifically that the statute here under attack, section 9 of the General Business Law,1 often referred to as the sabbath law, was a (p 449) "constitutional exercises [sic] of legislative power” and, further, that there was no basis "for defendant’s assertion that it has been denied equal protection of the law because of [claimed] discriminatory enforcement of the statute.”

Now, three of my colleagues would hold this very same *336section…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API