Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 8, 1895No. 9000PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Stearns county, Searle, J., denying their motion to set aside a verdict and for a new trial, in an action for damages for malicious entry and assault

1Opinion of the CourtCanty, J.

Many of the material facts in this case appear in the statement of facts and opinion in a former appeal. See 54 Minn. 801, 55 N. W. 1134. After being then remanded, it was again tried in the court below. The jury found a verdict for plaintiff, and against both defendants, for the sum of $1,000, and from an order denying the motion of defendants for a new trial this appeal is taken.

*13We are of the opinion that the assignments of error to the admission of evidence and the charge and refusal to charge are none of them well taken, and are not of sufficient importance to warrant any particular…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mitchell v. MitchellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Blume v. ScheerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API