Legal Opinion

Cox v. City of Albuquerque

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1949No. 5197PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SADLER, Justice.

We are called upon to decide whether L. 1947, c. 211, providing for the annexation to any incorporated city or town of territory abutting or contiguous thereto, and setting up the machinery for accomplishing the annexation, constitutes an unlawful delegation of legislative power to the board of arbitrators created by the act to perform designated functions in connection therewith. Incidental to determination of this main question, we must also resolve the issue whether the act is bad because enforcing compulsory arbitration on the parties involved and the further question…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mayor of Valverde v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  2. In Re City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  3. State v. Southern Pac. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
  4. State Ex Rel. Dresden v. District Court of Second Judicial Dist. Ex Rel. Bernalillo CountyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Elkins v. LallierNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. FloresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Fort v. NealNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Keller v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Benally v. PigmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  5. City Commission v. State ex rel. NicholsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API