Legal Opinion

Crowner v. Crowner

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1880PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Clinton. Divorce. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

Tbe bill in this case is filed for a divorce because of alleged adultery. The parties were married in 1866, and the adultery is alleged to have taken place in May, 1879. There is no direct evidence of the alleged offense, but circumstances of a suspicious nature are sworn to by two children of the parties, the eldest of whom was twelve years of age when sworn, and both of whom would seem, if their evidence is trusted, to have precocious understanding of the nature and criminality of the conduct charged. We had occasion in Kneale v. Kneale 28 Mich. 344, to comment upon the manifest impropriety…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kneale v. KnealeMichigan Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Buck v. BuckMichigan Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API