Cross v. Hall
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Prince Georges county. This was an action of assumpsit, brought by the appellant on the 12th of August 1850, upon a promissory note in her favor, dated July 26th, 1847,, payable one day after date,, signed by the appellee and another. The pleas were non assumpsit and limitations.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Prince Georges county. This was an action of assumpsit, brought by the appellant on the 12th of August 1850, upon a promissory note in her favor, dated July 26th, 1847,, payable one day after date,, signed by the appellee and another. The pleas were non assumpsit and limitations. A ne recipiatur to the second plea having been overruled the case was tried at April term 1852, upon issues joined on both pleas, and a verdict was rendered for the defendant upon both. Exception. The plaintiff, in support of the ne recipiatur, entered on the 9th of May 1851,…
1Opinion of the CourtTuck, J.
This is an action of assumpsit by the appellant against the appellee, and another, upon whom the writ was not served. The defendant pleaded non assumpsit and limitations. Issue was joined on the first plea, and the plaintiff entered a ne redpiatur to the second, on the ground that it was not filed in time, This having been overruled, the parties went to trial *429on both pleas. The verdict on each was for the defendant, and judgment entered accordingly. The appeal is taken from the refusal of the court to strike out the plea of limitations.
We deem it unnecessary to express any opinion on this…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bryan v. Coursey ex rel. De CourseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1852
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hurst v. HillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1855