Damme v. Pike Enters.
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Nebraska Advance Sheets 620 289 NEBRASKA REPORTS the domestic abuse theory, and she cannot now change to a harassment theory. We conclude that Linda’s cross-appeal lacks merit. CONCLUSION The district court incorrectly granted a domestic abuse pro- tection order, because William’s conduct did not fit within the statutory definition of “abuse” under § 42-903(1). Allowing Linda to shift to a harassment theory on appeal would violate fundamental principles of law. We reverse the judgment of the district court and remand the cause with directions to deny the requested domestic abuse protection…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Murray v. Utah Labor CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2013
- King v. Industrial Com'n of UtahCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
- Cords v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- Frauendorfer v. Lindsay Manufacturing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2002
- Miner v. Robertson Home FurnishingNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.