Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 16, 1966No. 824PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Exceptions in the record not set out in the appellant’s brief, or in support of which no reason or argument is stated or authority cited, are deemed abandoned by him. Rule 28 of the Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court of North Carolina. We have, however, examined the entire record and find no merit in any exception noted therein.

There is no error' in the instruction of the court concerning the rule that the testimony of an accomplice is to be carefully scrutinized. State v. Bailey, 254 N.C. 380, 119 S.E. 2d 165; Strong, N. C. Index, Criminal Law, § 111, Supplement. The defendant contends…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. BaileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SaultsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
  3. State v. BradyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API