Staten v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DRAUGHN, Justice.
Appellant, Bill Dee Staten, was tried and found guilty of promotion of obscene material. Punishment was assessed at thirty days confinement and a five hundred dollar fine. After timely notice of appeal, appellant filed an affidavit of indigency and requested that his transcription of trial testimony be prepared without cost. Staten appeals from the trial court’s denial of this request. We find that the denial was improper and accordingly abate the appeal.
Article 40.09(5) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure (Vernon 1983) contains the procedure for obtaining a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Abdnor v. OvardCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Barber v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Zanghetti v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Warminski v. DearCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
3Cited by7 opinions
- Abdnor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Sparkman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2000
- Taylor v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1990
- In Re Luebe, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
- Arron Joshua Castillo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.