Legal Opinion

State v. Thomes

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 2, 1927PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPattangall, J.

Indictment for larceny under section 1, chapter 122 R. S. General demurrer. Right to plead anew reserved. Demurrer overruled. Exceptions taken.

Demurrer is based on the failure to sufficiently describe the property alleged to have been the subject of larceny. That portion of the indictment reads:

Sundry, gold, silver, nickel and copper coins, national bank bills, United States treasury notes and certificates and Federal Reserve notes, checks, bills of exchange and other security for money and things of great value all of the aggregate value of one Thousand Dollars.

In an indictment for larceny…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. McClungWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Commonwealth v. GallagherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  3. Commonwealth v. BrettunMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  4. Commonwealth v. ButtsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  5. Commonwealth v. GreenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Morgan v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  2. State v. HibberdOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Briggs v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1956
  4. State v. FitzherbertSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1968
  5. State v. JamisonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API